Hid Behind A False Name and Chronology. (16)
The forest and winter behind my house. |
© Eso A. B., 2012
When the time arrived that T or Tau became an instrument of death not only for common men and women, but to which VIPs were tied also, it necessitated that it become an symbol elevated above the mundane, and was therefore embelished with an overhead inscription. The more titled the victim, the more the words on the inscription. This was the time when the T was extended along its vertical axis. The most important inscription of which we know is Jesus’s INRI, or “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews”.
Whether the King of the Jews was Jezus of Nazareth is not as sure a certainty as orethodox believers would like everyone to think. There remain many questions where Jesus came from and wherefrom his name. Could the name have come by way of a pareidolic intercession from the name Basil? That is, from Basil to Vasil< Vazil< Yazil< Yezu? It may be that the bloodshed that was to come later as if on Basil’s behalf, was a consequence of an attempt to impose on the public mind another name, the original of which name may have been John or one of John’s innumerable cognates, such as Yan, Ian, Ivan, Van (Vanyka). Jon, Johann, Hans, Huan, Wotan (Yon-tan/ Jonathan), etc.
Readers who are not committed to standarticized and ethicized orthodox beliefs may not find it so strange to discover that John, also known as John the Baptist or John the Anointer (Healer, because once in Egypt an Embalmer of corpses), not only may have preceded Jesus, but may have been displaced by Jesus. The latter would have happened because the numinosity of Jesus’s name may have given him a great hold over the imagination of the people. Since Jesus is said to have been a carpenter, the name—by way of anomatopeia—may have triggered an association with a saw, such as Jee-zus, Jee-zus. Since the name of John is also associated with rejuvenation, as in the winter and suummer solstice of January (according to the old 13 month calendar) and June, a replacement of his name with that of another, was enough to replace the name of the arch-Christian John altogether.
The reader may by now recognize the method by which the absurd is imposed on the public as a sociaty-wide belief.
In this blog series, we began with the men of the Ona tribe of Fierro del Fuego, who forced their fantasy of themselves as Gods on their entire tribe by murdering their women (and possibly children). Death is not happily met with if dying is presented as a gruesome, and painful event forced on humankind in order to cause it to accept something normally percieved as absurd. Worse, once fear forces the door open and seeps into our brain matter, it may spread like a virus not only through our organism, but mind-memes may distribute it throughout our entire society.
Such a development serves a ruling elite to keep its wealth and priviledges to itself through pseudo “laws”, which, among other things, inhibits subjective and private thoughts.
The 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries are examples of times when humankind finds itself under the influence of fear and terror. Such a state of mind causes unreason to be dominant at all social levels, the scientific and scholarly including. Though scientific achievements at this time may have been significant, the timidity of scholars and scientists in the face of fear and terror is unlikely to be more forthright with the governing bodies of the state than ordinary citizenss.
If repression of the mind in MesoAmerica began with the murder of women in Tierro del Fuego, we must also ask where and how it began on the Euro-Asian landmass? There is no easy answer, of course. However, the reason for this may not be because of difficulties of logic, but because the chronology of history of the so-called West is arbitrary and cannot be depended on.
The question of chronology of history as presented by the historians of the West is suspect not only because of the rule of fear and terror in the West, but because interests of the terrorizers have prevailed to our own time. At least, some knowledgeable minds, ever since Newton have expressed considerable doubts about the accuracy of historical chronology. We will see possibilities for alternative chronologies reflected in the subject matter of upcoming blogs.
No comments:
Post a Comment